When did dancing the horizontal rhumba become a blase event or at least a common one in the lives of unmarried men and women, as characters on television increasingly divulge? Filmgoers have long since become accustomed to the sophisticated and daring levels of scenes expressing violence and less and less implicit stories of sex. But now the last citadel of modesty, television is being besieged to drop any pretense of it. Nudity in fact, common on European channels for a long time, is coming to America's airwaves and not just on cable t.v.
But what was Sue Ane's true gift to us? She was an artist who would have thrived in any age, but her transitional role of Irma Johnson was a kind of final hand holding by Langdon's character for the shy and those a bit frightened about cheating as a lighthearted adventure. How could it be so bad when Irma's earnestness and friendly, guileless ways signaled neither danger nor damnation? If it felt good, so the mantra of the '60s assured us, it was good. Half a century later, a click of the computer mouse brings a near instantaneous roar of a lion of lust in the forms of any imaginable (or unimaginable) image of carnality, bestiality or in short, imagination-starving visions of deadliness: prideful displays offering no joy but mind altering and addicting excitement. Hefner and his disciples (four generations since the '54 "maiden"cover of "Playboy" with Marilyn Monroe gracing it) still chase the dream of adolescent consequence-free fornication. Pornography stuffs many a pocketbook and we let it seep further and further into our mainstream culture with each passing decade. The match was struck long before Sue Ane's gyrations and to rail against adultery or promiscuity is perhaps akin to scolding hungry men who rob a bakery. Still, self-control is invariably left with no champions in mass culture and advertising. Is the legalization of abortion unrelated to these sea changes in mores in the period described? I think not. Demanding certain things, certain outcomes, like the satiety of all our animal needs when and where we desire and on our terms, well this may appeal irresistibly to the normal human inclination to control one's environment, but it does nothing to address another human longing: to nurture and to preserve the race. Marriage, commitment and children: these entities have been devalued as the afore mentioned ones have been raised up and embraced by an increasingly troubled and restless nation. Few consciously shout out militantly for libertine causes, but the constant cynical and glib denigration of traditional values and religious convictions in the media is a huge concern for this blogger. A renaissance of decency awaits combative strides by younger and stronger cultural warriors for whom these verities are like wondrous discoveries that their natural idealism can empower. I'll cheer them on.
But what was Sue Ane's true gift to us? She was an artist who would have thrived in any age, but her transitional role of Irma Johnson was a kind of final hand holding by Langdon's character for the shy and those a bit frightened about cheating as a lighthearted adventure. How could it be so bad when Irma's earnestness and friendly, guileless ways signaled neither danger nor damnation? If it felt good, so the mantra of the '60s assured us, it was good. Half a century later, a click of the computer mouse brings a near instantaneous roar of a lion of lust in the forms of any imaginable (or unimaginable) image of carnality, bestiality or in short, imagination-starving visions of deadliness: prideful displays offering no joy but mind altering and addicting excitement. Hefner and his disciples (four generations since the '54 "maiden"cover of "Playboy" with Marilyn Monroe gracing it) still chase the dream of adolescent consequence-free fornication. Pornography stuffs many a pocketbook and we let it seep further and further into our mainstream culture with each passing decade. The match was struck long before Sue Ane's gyrations and to rail against adultery or promiscuity is perhaps akin to scolding hungry men who rob a bakery. Still, self-control is invariably left with no champions in mass culture and advertising. Is the legalization of abortion unrelated to these sea changes in mores in the period described? I think not. Demanding certain things, certain outcomes, like the satiety of all our animal needs when and where we desire and on our terms, well this may appeal irresistibly to the normal human inclination to control one's environment, but it does nothing to address another human longing: to nurture and to preserve the race. Marriage, commitment and children: these entities have been devalued as the afore mentioned ones have been raised up and embraced by an increasingly troubled and restless nation. Few consciously shout out militantly for libertine causes, but the constant cynical and glib denigration of traditional values and religious convictions in the media is a huge concern for this blogger. A renaissance of decency awaits combative strides by younger and stronger cultural warriors for whom these verities are like wondrous discoveries that their natural idealism can empower. I'll cheer them on.